I’m pleased to reprint here a blog post from Shaili Jain, MD, a dedicated VA psychiatrist who works at the Palo Alto Veterans Medical Center — who also is a fine writer. In both capacities, she contributes to a new PLOS BLOG “Mind the Brain,” of which I am editor/manager. In this post she confronts the disturbing fact that 5 veterans who are presently under VA care are still dying by suicide on a daily basis. Jain achieves the difficult balancing act of seamlessly blending her personal and scientific perspectives on this tough subject.
Posted: September 27, 2012
The alarm clock, flashing 03:00 in green neon, signals to me that I should be fast asleep. I close my eyes and take deep breaths, trying to lull myself back into a peaceful slumber–the day ahead holds a daunting schedule with no room for yawns or fatigue. Then it appears, pops right into the forefront of my mind, a solitary question that has needled its way through my dreams, forcing me to deal with its implications. “Did you miss something with Dave?” Instantly I recognize this thought as residue from yesterday’s day at work, something that had been neglected amongst the whirlwind of patient visits, typing of progress notes, writing of prescriptions, answering of emails, voice mails and texts.
In the still darkness of my bedroom, I strain to recall the details of his clinic visit. My patient Dave, a veteran, had been home from Iraq for two years, but the passage of time had not healed his psychological wounds. Through stifled tones he told me about his tormented nights and stunned days—horrifying memories, so difficult to erase, now dangerously directing his life. Tears had welled in his honey brown eyes that were dulled by the weight of war. Silence hung between us and I shifted uneasily in my chair, hesitating to reach for the Kleenex. Then, I asked the question I was duty bound to ask, “Have you had thoughts to kill yourself?” A pause, then, “No, Doc, No.”
I run through a mental checklist, to make sure I had done all that his clinical condition had required, I had: increased his Sertraline dosage (a medication to treat symptoms of posttraumatic stress); prescribed a short course of sleep medication to help ease the agony of his insomnia; recommended he see his therapist weekly instead of every other week; called his therapist and shared my concerns and asked him to return to my clinic in two weeks (the time it would take for the extra Sertraline to kick in) instead of the usual month. As I had walked him to the door, I had made sure he had all the emergency numbers to call if things got worse.
It seemed, on paper at least, I had done all I was supposed to do — so then why am I tossing and turning at this ungodly hour?
My heart sinks as I realize what had been missing from my visit with Dave: the “click”. The click is a feeling that is beyond rational comprehension, more intuition than fact, it can come and go in the blink of an eye and is hard to quantify or measure. The presence of the click signals to me that my patient is telling me everything I need to know, we are on the same page and we share the same hope for their recovery. The click signals a mutual trust and respect and a healthy alliance in our relationship. Treating thousands of patients, over a decade of clinical practice, has taught me that the absence of the click invariably means trouble is brewing.
Now the green neon flashes 04:00. I sigh and get out of bed knowing full well that sleep will evade me. I wait for dawn and a reasonable time for when I can call Dave to make sure he is okay.
Available Research on Veterans and Suicide
30,000 to 32,000 Americans die from suicide per year and about 20% of these Americans are veterans. It is important to make the distinction between veterans i.e. persons who have served in the military, naval or air service and are now discharged from active duty personnel i.e. persons who are still serving in the military. The distinction is important because in Army and Marine active duty personnel the statistics are different, for this population, suicide rates have nearly doubled between 2005 and 2009. A recent and thoughtful analysis of this tragic situation can be found here.
I am a psychiatrist, working for Veterans Affairs (VA), so the subject of veteran suicide is never far from my mind. There are about 5 deaths from suicide, per day, among veterans who also receive care in VA hospitals like the one where I work. More than 60% of these suicides occur among veterans who use VA services and are known to have a mental health condition. The statistics are sobering and as troops return home from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan the topic of veteran suicide will, no doubt, continue to vex and distress all concerned parties.
In high income countries, like the U.S., suicide usually occurs in the context of mental illness. Hence, the key to suicide prevention is providing high quality mental healthcare for the mental health disorder that ails the person seeking help. Whilst Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Traumatic Brain Injury (the signature injury of the Iraq war) are always forefront in the minds of professionals treating veterans, our care would be reductionistic if we did not thoroughly evaluate for and treat other common mental health disorders such as clinical depression, alcohol or drug addiction, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. All of these mental health disorders are associated with an elevated suicide risk so getting the diagnosis correct is crucial. The diagnosis dictates what the treatment should be and the correct treatment increases the odds of recovery from the specific mental health disorder. This is still our best strategy for preventing suicide.
In reality there are, however, many obstacles to this strategy. For mental health treatment to be effective it often requires the steady delivery of treatment for several weeks (i.e. a certain dose of psychological treatments and psychotropic medication is often needed for a sustained recovery). Yet, studies have shown that, amongst recent returnees from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan who have PTSD, for instance, such treatment courses are less likely to be completed.
Specifically with regards to psychotropic medication: Guidelines addressing the treatment of veterans with PTSD strongly recommend a therapeutic trial (i.e. taking the medication for long enough and at enough dosage to see its full effect on symptoms) of medications called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Yet a recent study we published shows that, when compared to veterans from previous eras, recent returnees from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan were less likely to complete such a therapeutic trial. Moreover, if they were clinically depressed, in addition to having PTSD, their odds of getting a therapeutic trial were diminished even further. This hints to, as yet, unexplained obstacles to engaging veterans from the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, in mental health treatment—a disconcerting thought for clinicians who work with this population.
Another obstacle is that, despite the best efforts of an individual clinician, the reality is that conventional mental health services still fail to reach many individuals who are suicidal i.e. many of those who are suicidal are not even engaged in the healthcare system to begin with. The health disparities literature is replete with evidence demonstrating how, in our society, those most in need of psychiatric and medical care are often the least likely to get it. Social determinants such as where one lives, economic security, housing quality and employment opportunities all play a key role in the development of such inequities. These limitations have been compounded by a historic lack of coordinated suicide prevention strategies by well-meaning organizations and agencies. So this begs the question, what is the VA system doing to prevent veteran suicide?
In 2004, the VA started to focus on deficits in its mental healthcare services and developed a VA Comprehensive Mental Health Strategic Plan to address identified problems and focused suicide prevention efforts beginning in 2007. Examples of outreach efforts are a 24/7 suicide prevention hotline where veterans, or those concerned about a veteran, can call 1-800-273-8255 and then press 1 to be connected to a VA mental health professional trained to deal with the immediate crisis. A written Chat Service at http://veteranscrisisline.net/Default.aspx and a texting service, at 838255, both of which connect those in crisis directly to mental health professionals is also available.
In addition, screening and assessment processes have been set up through the system to assist in the identification of patients at risk for suicide. The VA electronic medical record has a suicide risk flagging system that has been developed to assure continuity of care and enhance awareness among care-givers. Each VA medical center has a suicide prevention coordinator, whose job it is to ensure the Veteran, at risk, is connected to the right services and receives adequate followed up. Those identified as high risk receive an enhanced level of care, including missed appointment follow ups, safety planning and weekly follow up visits.
The relative recency of these efforts means their actual effectiveness in reducing suicide rates remains to be fully evaluated. Speaking from the viewpoint of a physician, who has worked in a variety of hospital systems from public to private, it is hard not to be impressed by the comprehensive nature of VA’s current suicide prevention efforts. Furthermore, dedicated and well trained professionals continue to come up with thoughtful and innovative ways to tackle these tough problems head on.
Yet there has only been a slight decrease in suicide in VA treated veterans in recent years and this begs the question: Why does this goal of reducing suicide rates amongst Veterans (and, indeed, the general public also) remain so elusive?
Some of these reasons lie in the state of the science of suicide research. We have a lack of knowledge regarding the fundamental biological markers that could help us predict who will commit suicide. Risk of suicide is shared by biological, but not adoptive relatives, prompting the conclusion that familiality of suicide is due to genes rather than family environment or culture. Yet, despite gargantuan efforts on the part of psychiatric researchers, there is currently no suicide gene or genetic test that would be useful in predicting risk of suicidal behavior in any particular individual.
From an epidemiological standpoint, we know several clinical factors that are associated with increasing the odds someone will commit suicide. These factors include: having a mental illness; endorsing suicidal ideation; a prior history of a suicide attempt; a recent interpersonal loss; recent discharge from a psychiatric hospital and family history of suicide.Yet, with an overall rate of 11.3 American suicide deaths per 100,000 people, it is very hard to predict who will actually commit suicide as there are many people who have these clinical risk factors (i.e. the risks are common) but relatively few of these people will actually commit suicide. In short, the predictive validity of these clinical risk factors is poor. Add to this the reality that human beings are infinitely complex (and not just a sum of their clinical risk factors) means identifying under what exact circumstances, and at what point in time, a high risk individual may actually attempt suicide is seemingly impossible.
To complicate matters further a clinician cannot simply rely on a patient’s denial of suicidal ideation when assessing suicide risk. The reality is a suicidal patient may not be inclined to admit their suicidality to a mental health professional for fear they will be forced into treatment or that this will result in their suicidal plans being challenged. This complicates the dynamic between caregiver and patient and regrettably means that even the most well meaning vigilant clinicians may not be able to identify a suicidal patient.
A Time Honored Tradition
Faced with the complexities and uncertainties surrounding the issues of veteran suicide, I find myself relying heavily on a time honored tradition of medicine—the power of a strong therapeutic alliance with my patient; the importance of creating an environment where they feel they can say whatever is on their mind and making it clear that, if things are not going well, I want to know about it. Creating such an environment is no easy feat as 21st century medical practice offers no end of distraction to the practicing physician: back to back clinic schedules; an electronic medical record that dishes up a steady stream of alerts, notifications and orders that require your continued visual attention; instant messages, email, texts and phone calls that ask you to make, in real time, clinical decisions and judgments and, of course, mounds of paperwork. In such an environment, I find listening—really listening– to my patient has become one of the most powerful things I can offer. Listening creates silent spaces that can be filled with a patient’s expressions of their worst fears and deepest secrets, untainted by fabrication or distortion.
In my office, I watch the clock ticking on the wall. The second it hits 8AM, I pick up the phone and call Dave’s cell phone number. The phone rings and rings, my heart sinks as I fear it is heading for voice mail, then skips a beat as it is picked up,
“Hi Dave, its Dr. Jain from the Palo Alto VA”
“Oh hi Doc,
“I know yesterday was a bad day for you, so I thought I would just check in.”
“I am thinking you should come back to clinic in a week instead of next week; how does that sound?”
“Yes, I think that would be a good idea.”
There it is—in his voice, what had been missing from clinic, an inflection in his tone, a subtle change but somehow reassuring—the click. He is listening to me and, perhaps more importantly, he knows I am listening to him— we are a team working toward a mutually agreed upon goal. I know this does not guarantee that there will not be troubled times ahead but, for now, this is enough.
The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
In an effort to protect individual patient privacy the patient stories depicted here are composites of various real encounters brought together to illustrate the situation.